httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Chris Simmons" <>
Subject RE: 2.0.26?
Date Thu, 30 Aug 2001 11:07:39 GMT
Don't count your chickens before they hatch.

It's the attitude and uninformed lot of people such as yourself that is 
contributing to the misinformation out there. I'm not slighting you 
personally, but I wanted to let you know that BeOS does have a future, 
in the eyes of many, from either a financial solution, or a development 
one. just one effort underway at the moment to 
help show Palm Inc. that there is indeed a future in the minds of many 
in the Community.

If you wish to discuss this offlist, please feel free to contact me 

-Chris Simmons
Avid BeOS user.

>BeOS just got sold to Palm... It's unlikely it's going to become a
>mainstream OS anytime soon.
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Cliff Woolley [] 
>Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:19 PM
>To:; David Reid
>Subject: Re: 2.0.26?
>On 29 Aug 2001, Ian Holsman wrote:
>> should we re-roll&tar 26 (which would include a patch to worker and 
>> ldap_cache, some NW fixes and the apr-dbm change)
>> or just re-tag the 2 files modified as 25 and re tar?
>It'd be nice if it built on BeOS.  ::prod, prod::  :-)  I vote for 26
>tomorrow midday to fix these issues.  I'll volunteer to RM since 
>already done it once in 24 hours.  =-)
>   Cliff Woolley
>   Charlottesville, VA

View raw message