httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Cliff Woolley <cliffwool...@yahoo.com>
Subject RE: [PATCH] RE: make distclean doesn't
Date Fri, 31 Aug 2001 17:42:33 GMT
On Fri, 31 Aug 2001, Charles Randall wrote:

> From: Justin Erenkrantz [mailto:jerenkrantz@ebuilt.com]
> >FWIW, we should not remove the config.nice files or certain generated
> >files (exports.c seems to come to mind) under any circumstances.  We
> >also don't remove build.mk because it is like a Makefile (which we
> >don't seem to remove).

The Makefiles _are_ removed by make distclean.  I don't know why the
rules.mk isn't.

config.nice should be kept because it possibly represents a lot of
configuration effort by the user.  If they want to overwrite it, fine...
all they have to do is call ./configure with different parameters.  But
keeping it is a Good Thing IMO.  I use it after distcleans and even
extracleans all the time.  It's invaluable.

> Hmm. Am I the only one who assumes that "make distclean" is supposed to
> return the directory structure to the state of distribution?

That's true.  Give or take the config.nice thing.

--Cliff

--------------------------------------------------------------
   Cliff Woolley
   cliffwoolley@yahoo.com
   Charlottesville, VA



Mime
View raw message