httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ian Holsman <i...@cnet.com>
Subject Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS
Date Fri, 17 Aug 2001 17:25:21 GMT
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:

>From: "Ian Holsman" <ianh@cnet.com>
>Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:18 AM
>
>
>>William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>>
>>>>jerenkrantz    01/08/16 17:26:38
>>>>  
>>>>      * use apu_dbm in mod_auth_dbm
>>>>          Status: Greg +1 (low-priority volunteer)
>>>> +        Justin says: "Seems like this is already there, so should we just

>>>> +                      remove the other DBM code in that file?  If you want

>>>> +                      to use gdbm, or dbm, etc, you should tell apr-util."
>>>>
>>>I'm not sure about this.
>>>
>>>If a user has many (existing) gdbm user databases, but would rather use Berkley
db 
>>>for caching performance in the bits like mod_ssl and mod_usertrack, why should
we 
>>>cripple their auth_dbm?
>>>
>>this would be better solved with apr-util allow multiple DB types to be 
>>created
>>(similiar to how SMS works)
>>
>>maybe a apr_dbm_create_gdbm()
>>    apr_dbm_create_berkley_db()
>>    apr_dbm_create_ndbm()
>>set of routines is required
>>
>
>+1 (have a patch to offer :-?)
>
not yet.
but soon




Mime
View raw message