httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Brian Havard" <>
Subject Re: configuration directives for spmt_os2
Date Mon, 13 Aug 2001 05:25:21 GMT
On Thu, 9 Aug 2001 17:20:59 -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote:

>Sorry, didn't mean to send this to the list.  When I said it was messed up,
>I meant the OS/2 MPM wasn't like the rest of them.  My general feeling
>is that if the OS/2 or Windows MPMs don't make sense, leave them alone, 
>and let the developers who understand them do any work on them

Fair enough. It is actually quite a mess due to the fact that it was a
quick hack port of prefork with threads substituted for processes. I'm
currently working on an mpmt MPM for OS/2 that will replace it, written
from scratch. It currently runs & serves requests but still needs some work
to be complete.

I'd like to call it mpmt_os2 but MPM naming seems to have moved away from
that convention (which I prefered). Do we have an MPM naming convension or
is it just whatever the author feels like?

 |  Brian Havard                 |  "He is not the messiah!                   |
 |  |  He's a very naughty boy!" - Life of Brian |

View raw message