Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 61797 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2001 21:14:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org Received: (qmail 61719 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2001 21:14:50 -0000 X-Authentication-Warning: cobra.cs.Virginia.EDU: jcw5q owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 17:14:52 -0400 (EDT) From: Cliff Woolley X-X-Sender: To: Subject: RE: mod_file_cache performance In-Reply-To: <85063BBE668FD411944400D0B744267A481B79@AUSMAIL> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Mon, 2 Jul 2001, Gonyou, Austin wrote: > I see..so you're saying the cache file should be "the highest" perhaps? > If that's the case, then it seems that there is something possibly related > to accessing the cache which is causing you a bottleneck? > Perhaps this is indicitive of some further MPM issues. What MPM did you use > to do this test? Threaded? Yes, threaded. I'll try it again with prefork and see what happens. The particular case I was trying to fix and test was in a multi-threaded case, which is why I tried it with threaded in the first place... but you're right it would be a good sanity check to try it with prefork and see if the numbers look more sane. --Cliff -------------------------------------------------------------- Cliff Woolley cliffwoolley@yahoo.com Charlottesville, VA