Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org
Message-ID: <85063BBE668FD411944400D0B744267A643368@AUSMAIL>
From: "Gonyou, Austin" <austin@coremetrics.com>
To: "'new-httpd@apache.org'" <new-httpd@apache.org>
Subject: RE: Mike Abbot's Patches
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 11:11:39 -0500 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"

Ok..I was just curious cause I was on SGI's site last night doing some
performance related research..and I saw that those patches were still up and
remembered some discussion on that some time ago. Didn't remember what the
final outcome was though. Thanks for the feedback!

-- 
Austin Gonyou
Systems Architect, CCNA
Coremetrics, Inc.
Phone: 512-796-9023
email: austin@coremetrics.com 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill Stoddard [mailto:bill@wstoddard.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 6:07 PM
> To: new-httpd@apache.org
> Subject: Re: Mike Abbot's Patches
> 
> 
> I worked a few of the simple ones into Apache 2.0.  Also 
> added a 'quick_handler' hook to
> facilitate adding the quick cache to Apache 2.0.  At this 
> point in Apache 2.0 development,
> you should not expect much in the way of performance.  The 
> threaded MPM scales much better
> than Apache 1.3 (uses much less memory per connected client) 
> but the straight through
> instruction path is a bit worse than Apache 1.3 right now.  
> We'll get that fixed though.
> 
> Bill
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Gonyou, Austin" <austin@coremetrics.com>
> To: <new-httpd@apache.org>
> Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 6:30 PM
> Subject: Mike Abbot's Patches
> 
> 
> > Were any of those patches ever put into 2.0 MPM or 1.3.x? 
> Just curious,
> > don't remember which ones/if any, were ever accepted.
> >
> > --
> > Austin Gonyou
> > Systems Architect, CCNA
> > Coremetrics, Inc.
> > Phone: 512-796-9023
> > email: austin@coremetrics.com
> >
>