Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org
Errors-To: <wrowe@rowe-clan.net>
Message-ID: <09ef01c116d1$7b0c63b0$95c0b0d0@roweclan.net>
From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wrowe@rowe-clan.net>
To: <new-httpd@apache.org>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.32.0107271444230.27547-100000@cobra.cs.Virginia.EDU>
Subject: Re: Outstanding issues?
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 14:22:12 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Retagged just now, no effect on non-win32 platforms...

T server/mpm/winnt/service.c
T srclib/apr/apr.mak
T srclib/apr/libapr.mak
T srclib/apr/apr.dsp
T srclib/apr/libapr.dsp
T srclib/apr/test/MakeWin32Make.pl
T srclib/apr/test/aprtest.dsp
T srclib/apr/test/aprtest.win

Next question.  We need to get srclib/apr/include/apr_thread_proc.h fixed for
this tag if we want apr/test/ to be at a stable point.  Since apr/test/ isn't
part of the distro (why did I just go to the trouble of bumping the apr/test/
stuff anyways ???), it seems kind of silly to fix it.  The only question, is
OS2 hurting for that export that was hidden behind the ifdef?

Short answer, if it hurts OS2, let's get it fixed, and roll this on out of here :)

Bill

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Cliff Woolley" <cliffwoolley@yahoo.com>
To: <new-httpd@apache.org>
Cc: "David Reid" <dreid@jetnet.co.uk>; "Brian Havard" <brianh@kheldar.apana.org.au>
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 1:51 PM
Subject: Outstanding issues?


> 
> 
> Are there any known problems with the APACHE_2_0_22_dev tag (besides the
> fact that some of us don't like its name... this group never agrees on
> names anyway)?
> 
> I kind of thought that some of the changes made by David and Brian this
> morning might warrant bumping the tags on a few files to make BeOS and
> OS/2 more happy, but I see the tags haven't been bumped yet.  I'm willing
> to bump them if it means we get something that's that much closer to a
> beta.
> 
> In particular, I'm talking about these files:
> 
>     httpd-2.0/configure.in
>     httpd-2.0/os/os2/core.mk
>     apr/configure.in
>     apr/Makefile.in
> 
> Are there any other currently known problems with APACHE_2_0_22_dev that
> could cause 2.0.22 to be vetoed as a beta?
> 
> --Cliff
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>    Cliff Woolley
>    cliffwoolley@yahoo.com
>    Charlottesville, VA
> 
> 
> 
>