Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 35604 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2001 20:38:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org Received: (qmail 35539 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2001 20:38:17 -0000 Errors-To: Message-ID: <07ae01c1115b$8faa3fc0$93c0b0d0@roweclan.net> From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." To: References: <20010720202801.25863.qmail@apache.org> Subject: Re: cvs tag: httpd-2.0 APACHE_2_0_21 Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 15:33:22 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N From: Sent: Friday, July 20, 2001 3:28 PM > Log: > > Push forward tag to apply htpasswd.c and win32 build fix. Could someone please call up the tar script for Unix .tar.gz/.tar.Z? The valid dev.apache.org/dist/httpd-2_0_21-alpha.zip and the binary dev.apache.org/dist/binaries/apache-2_0_21-win32-x86-alpha.zip are now available for alpha validation. BTW ... until it goes to http://www.apache.org/dist/ it isn't so much as an alpha, by Roy's scheme, correct? Or did I miss something? Did we ever really document the acceptance and steps for tag -> alpha -> beta -> release on the new schema? Bill