httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Gonyou, Austin" <aus...@coremetrics.com>
Subject RE: New 2.0 convention confusion?
Date Sun, 22 Jul 2001 19:38:27 GMT
Perhaps rather than alpha...-ax -bx -gold, much the same way Linux kernels
are done? Or perhaps something along the
lines..apache_2_0_21-win32-x86-a1.zip?

-- 
Austin Gonyou
Systems Architect, CCNA
Coremetrics, Inc.
Phone: 512-796-9023
email: austin@coremetrics.com 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:wrowe@rowe-clan.net]
> Sent: Sunday, July 22, 2001 1:24 PM
> To: new-httpd@apache.org
> Subject: New 2.0 convention confusion?
> 
> 
> I was just downloading the binary I build on vc6 sp5 for 
> testing on my laptop...
> 
> wget 
> http://dev.apache.org/dist/binaries/apache-2_0_21-alpha-win32-x86.zip
> 
> ... and I got to thinking about the new naming convention.  
> Given that there _is_
> an alpha cpu (don't know how many are out there yet and 
> still), I'm just stopping
> to ask if folks expect that the -alpha -beta -gold names may 
> be mangled, later on.
> 
> Had I named the file apache-2_0_21-win32-x86-alpha.zip, this 
> would have been really
> troubling.
> 
> Just something to ponder, I don't have a quick solution to offer.
> 
> Bill
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

Mime
View raw message