httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Gonyou, Austin" <aus...@coremetrics.com>
Subject RE: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS
Date Fri, 20 Jul 2001 21:17:57 GMT
Here here..this is getting confusing, my scripts can't keep up! :) 

-- 
Austin Gonyou
Systems Architect, CCNA
Coremetrics, Inc.
Phone: 512-796-9023
email: austin@coremetrics.com 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cliff Woolley [mailto:cliffwoolley@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 20, 2001 4:06 PM
> To: new-httpd@apache.org
> Subject: Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS
> 
> 
> On Fri, 20 Jul 2001, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> 
> > Hey, what's going on with the retagging?  There exists on 
> developer dist:
> >
> >  -rw-r--r--  rbb      httpd  5383847 Jul 19 16:59 
> httpd-2_0_21-alpha.tar.Z
> >  -rw-r--r--  rbb      httpd      466 Jul 19 16:59 
> httpd-2_0_21-alpha.tar.Z.asc
> >  -rw-r--r--  rbb      httpd  3226188 Jul 19 16:59 
> httpd-2_0_21-alpha.tar.gz
> >  -rw-r--r--  rbb      httpd      466 Jul 19 16:59 
> httpd-2_0_21-alpha.tar.gz.asc
> >  -rw-r--r--  wrowe    httpd  4305440 Jul 20 13:20 
> httpd-2_0_21-alpha.zip
> >  -rw-r--r--  wrowe    httpd      477 Jul 20 13:16 
> httpd-2_0_21-alpha.zip.asc
> >
> > which means that there are now two different versions of 
> the source being
> > called 2.0.21?  That is bad.
> 
> I agree.  Ditch 2.0.21 and reroll 2.0.22 from scratch, IMO.
> 
> --Cliff
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>    Cliff Woolley
>    cliffwoolley@yahoo.com
>    Charlottesville, VA
> 
> 

Mime
View raw message