httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>
Subject Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS
Date Fri, 20 Jul 2001 22:38:51 GMT
From: "Ryan Bloom" <rbb@covalent.net>
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2001 5:25 PM


> On Friday 20 July 2001 15:14, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> > From: "Ryan Bloom" <rbb@covalent.net>
> > Sent: Friday, July 20, 2001 5:08 PM
> >
> > > > We have also dropped the subrevision that was available in
> > > > apache1.3.  This seems very wrong to me.  Thoughts?
> > >
> > > I can't parse this, what subrevision.
> >
> > the APACHE_RELEASE 10319100 constant.
> >
> > this could easily be adapted to the model I just described...
> >
> > 200xx000  devel
> > 200xx001  alpha_1
> > 200xx002  alpha_2
> > 200xx003  alpha_3
> > 200xx101  beta_1
> > 200xx200  release
> >
> > 200xx201 and later --- would not be not our doing.
> 
> We weren't using that anywhere.  Also, keeping this means that we are 
> storing revision information in two places, the server-string, and 
> the REVISION macro,

Yes, and so?  The release branch model would alternately allow us to change that
primary version to "2.0.x-alpha-1", "2.0.x-alpha-2", "2.0.x-beta-1" and finally
"2.0.x-gold".  That would also be a reasonable solution.

> oh, and the MMN.    :-(

Which you forgot to bump (see http://dev.apache.org/how-to-release.html 2. Note:)




Mime
View raw message