httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>
Subject Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS
Date Fri, 20 Jul 2001 22:19:02 GMT
From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wrowe@rowe-clan.net>
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2001 5:16 PM


> From: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@ebuilt.com>
> Sent: Friday, July 20, 2001 3:56 PM
> 
> 
> > Hey, what's going on with the retagging?  There exists on developer dist:
> > 
> >  -rw-r--r--  rbb      httpd  5383847 Jul 19 16:59 httpd-2_0_21-alpha.tar.Z
> >  -rw-r--r--  rbb      httpd      466 Jul 19 16:59 httpd-2_0_21-alpha.tar.Z.asc
> >  -rw-r--r--  rbb      httpd  3226188 Jul 19 16:59 httpd-2_0_21-alpha.tar.gz
> >  -rw-r--r--  rbb      httpd      466 Jul 19 16:59 httpd-2_0_21-alpha.tar.gz.asc
> >  -rw-r--r--  wrowe    httpd  4305440 Jul 20 13:20 httpd-2_0_21-alpha.zip
> >  -rw-r--r--  wrowe    httpd      477 Jul 20 13:16 httpd-2_0_21-alpha.zip.asc
> > 
> > which means that there are now two different versions of the source being
> > called 2.0.21?  That is bad.
> 
> They are now consistent.
> 
> As these files never left http://dev.apache.org/dist for http://www.apache.org/dist 
> I don't see an issue with using the 2.0.21 identifier.

Althought I would have no issue with renaming as httpd-2_0_21-alpha-r2.*

> Disagreement?




Mime
View raw message