httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Ryan Fox" <r...@noguska.com>
Subject Re: tarballs are up : BUILD FAILURE
Date Mon, 30 Jul 2001 18:09:56 GMT
Compiles ok on my RH 7.1 SGI XFS box, K7 1333, ATA100.  Buildconf worked OK
too. (Compiled before & after buildconf ok)

Ryan Fox


----- Original Message -----
From: "Gonyou, Austin" <austin@coremetrics.com>
To: <new-httpd@apache.org>
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 1:57 PM
Subject: RE: tarballs are up : BUILD FAILURE


> My box can't even begin to make the tarball.
> Here is the error output I get right after typing make:
>
> -------snip--------
> Making all in srclib
> make[1]: Entering directory `/home/austin/cvs/apache2/httpd-2_0_22/srclib'
> Making all in apr
> make[2]: Entering directory
> `/home/austin/cvs/apache2/httpd-2_0_22/srclib/apr'
> Making all in strings
> make[3]: Entering directory
> `/home/austin/cvs/apache2/httpd-2_0_22/srclib/apr/strings'
> make[4]: Entering directory
> `/home/austin/cvs/apache2/httpd-2_0_22/srclib/apr/strings'
> /bin/sh /home/austin/cvs/apache2/httpd-2_0_22/srclib/apr/libtool --silent
> --mode=compile
gcc -g -O2 -pthread   -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DLINUX=2 -D_REENTRANT
> -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 -D_BSD_SOURCE -D_SVID_SOURCE   -I../include
> -I../include/arch/unix  -c apr_cpystrn.c && touch apr_cpystrn.lo
> libtool: ltconfig version `' does not match ltmain.sh version
> `1.3.4-freebsd-ports'
> Fatal configuration error.  See the libtool docs for more information.
> make[4]: *** [apr_cpystrn.lo] Error 1
> make[4]: Leaving directory
> `/home/austin/cvs/apache2/httpd-2_0_22/srclib/apr/strings'
> make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> make[3]: Leaving directory
> `/home/austin/cvs/apache2/httpd-2_0_22/srclib/apr/strings'
> make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> make[2]: Leaving directory
> `/home/austin/cvs/apache2/httpd-2_0_22/srclib/apr'
> make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/austin/cvs/apache2/httpd-2_0_22/srclib'
> make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> -------snip--------
>
> I'm building on RH 7.1 SGI XFS running on an AMD Athlon-c 1.333.
> Disk is ATA 100 7200 RPM drive
>
> When building the configure using build conf, I get errors as well. Here's
> my output from that. Attatched is my config.log as well.
>
> -------snip--------
> [austin@UberGeek httpd-2_0_22]$ ./buildconf
> rebuilding srclib/apr/configure
> buildconf: checking installation...
> buildconf: autoconf version 2.13 (ok)
> buildconf: libtool version 1.4 (ok)
> Copying libtool helper files ...
> Creating include/arch/unix/apr_private.h.in ...
> Creating configure ...
> rebuilding srclib/apr-util/configure
> Incorporating /usr/share/aclocal/libtool.m4 into aclocal.m4 ...
> Copying libtool helper files ...
> You should add the contents of `/usr//share/aclocal/libtool.m4' to
> `aclocal.m4'.
> Putting files in AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR, `build'.
> Creating include/private/apu_config.h ...
> Creating configure ...
> Invoking xml/expat/buildconf.sh ...
> Incorporating /usr/share/aclocal/libtool.m4 into aclocal.m4 ...
> Copying libtool helper files ...
> You should add the contents of `/usr//share/aclocal/libtool.m4' to
> `aclocal.m4'.
> Putting files in AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR, `conftools'.
> Creating config.h.in ...
> Creating configure ...
> configure.in:75: AC_PROG_CPP was called before AC_PROG_CC
> rebuilding srclib/pcre/configure
> rebuilding include/ap_config_auto.h.in
> rebuilding configure
> -------snip--------
>
>
> --
> Austin Gonyou
> Systems Architect, CCNA
> Coremetrics, Inc.
> Phone: 512-796-9023
> email: austin@coremetrics.com
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Cliff Woolley [mailto:cliffwoolley@yahoo.com]
> > Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 12:30 PM
> > To: new-httpd@apache.org
> > Subject: Re: tarballs are up
> >
> >
> > On 30 Jul 2001, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> >
> > > > I just posted the 2.0.22 tarballs at dev.apache.org/dist.
> >  Check 'em out.
> > >
> > > +1 for beta
> >
> > Cooooollll... that's enough +1's for beta (OtherBill, Jeff,
> > myself, and
> > Justin).  That would seem to cover at least Win32 and a few flavors of
> > Unix (at least Linux and Solaris).  I'll wait a little while
> > longer for
> > confirmation from a few other platforms, and then go with it.  =-)
> >
> > Brian, David, how are OS/2 and BeOS looking?
> >
> > --Cliff
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------
> >    Cliff Woolley
> >    cliffwoolley@yahoo.com
> >    Charlottesville, VA
> >
> >
> >
>
>


Mime
View raw message