httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "David Reid" <dr...@jetnet.co.uk>
Subject Re: tarballs are up
Date Tue, 31 Jul 2001 17:31:48 GMT
yep, beos is fine and serving nicely...

Tweak to the SSL code after the roll, but that's not a stopper.

Does that mean we have beta 2????

david

----- Original Message -----
From: "Brian Havard" <brianh@kheldar.apana.org.au>
To: <new-httpd@apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 4:06 PM
Subject: Re: tarballs are up


> On Mon, 30 Jul 2001 13:30:10 -0400 (EDT), Cliff Woolley wrote:
>
> >On 30 Jul 2001, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> >
> >> > I just posted the 2.0.22 tarballs at dev.apache.org/dist.  Check 'em
out.
> >>
> >> +1 for beta
> >
> >Cooooollll... that's enough +1's for beta (OtherBill, Jeff, myself, and
> >Justin).  That would seem to cover at least Win32 and a few flavors of
> >Unix (at least Linux and Solaris).  I'll wait a little while longer for
> >confirmation from a few other platforms, and then go with it.  =-)
> >
> >Brian, David, how are OS/2 and BeOS looking?
>
> Working on OS/2 as far as my minimal testing goes (builds, serves a few
> pages).
>
> --
>
____________________________________________________________________________
__
>  |  Brian Havard                 |  "He is not the messiah!
|
>  |  brianh@kheldar.apana.org.au  |  He's a very naughty boy!" - Life of
Brian |
>  -------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
>
>


Mime
View raw message