Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org
Sender: trawick@bellsouth.net
To: new-httpd@apache.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove ap_parseHTTPdate and rename it.
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106051253040.29115-100000@twinlark.arctic.org>
	<Pine.GSO.4.32.0106051614110.25481-100000@cobra.cs.Virginia.EDU>
	<20010605133754.H21860@ebuilt.com> <20010605164001.J21860@ebuilt.com>
	<m3bso1ag86.fsf@adsl-77-241-65.rdu.bellsouth.net>
	<20010606085232.A14056@ebuilt.com>
From: Jeff Trawick <trawickj@bellsouth.net>
Date: 06 Jun 2001 14:00:50 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20010606085232.A14056@ebuilt.com>
Message-ID: <m31yox32ul.fsf@adsl-77-241-65.rdu.bellsouth.net>
Lines: 26
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Justin Erenkrantz <jerenkrantz@ebuilt.com> writes:

> On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 09:30:01AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> > Justin Erenkrantz <jerenkrantz@ebuilt.com> writes:
> > 
> > Tell me again what happens to ap_checkmask()?  It looks like proxy
> > uses it.  sorry if this is a faq, but I don't see relevant discussion
> > on new-httpd...
> 
> It's already in apr-util as apr_date_checkmask.  What's the
> question?

the question is the sentence above ending in '?' (which you answered,
by the way :) )...

I'm happy, I'll commit it...  I simply saw a remaining call to
ap_checkmask() which the proxy folks will have to clean up... it
wasn't immediately obvious to me what they would replace the call
with, but now I know.

Thanks,

-- 
Jeff Trawick | trawickj@bellsouth.net | PGP public key at web site:
       http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Park/9289/
             Born in Roswell... married an alien...