Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 83713 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2001 10:17:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org Received: (qmail 83699 invoked from network); 14 Jun 2001 10:17:45 -0000 X-Authentication-Warning: kurgan.lyra.org: gstein set sender to gstein@lyra.org using -f Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 03:17:52 -0700 From: Greg Stein To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] mgmt_get_vars hook Message-ID: <20010614031751.N31504@lyra.org> Mail-Followup-To: new-httpd@apache.org References: <3482305AF0F6CF469ED45C0D48FAFCF7091FF4ED@cnet48.cnet.com> <20010613131156.B31504@lyra.org> <3B27DA36.4C0BC0D2@covalent.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <3B27DA36.4C0BC0D2@covalent.net>; from harrie@covalent.net on Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 02:25:10PM -0700 X-URL: http://www.lyra.org/greg/ X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N Three +1 votes are not required for commits like this. That is really only needed when you have "big" functionality, or you make large (design) changes to the system. Most everything else is commit-then-review. I committed the code because it looked just right to me. With it in source control, we can refine it if necessary. But even better: we can build on it now. Discussion is never "closed" on any of the code. If you have a better way, then we can continue discussing. But I have to say, I believe the hook is the absolute right answer (it frees all endpoints from knowing about the others), and I think human-recognizable strings for names is appropriate. I also liked the set of types available for each item (integer, string, or a (sub) hash table) Cheers, -g On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 02:25:10PM -0700, Harrie Hazewinkel wrote: > Greg Stein wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 08:27:31AM -0700, Ian Holsman wrote: > > > [Latest Rev Of patch with the hook changed to RUN_ALL] > > > > I've applied this with some reasonably heavy changes. Watch for the CVS > > commit email. > > Hmm, I worry here about the process. If someone who has no commit > access wants to have things in or have things changed it > always creates a problem. If someone with commit access > this is good enough he just can commit it. > > If I counted well I only saw 1 times a '+1' on the > concept where 3 are needed. I also believe that some things > still need to change for this issue and we were not > done discussing it. > > > Harrie > -- > address: Covalent Technologies, 645 Howard St, San Francisco, CA - 94105 > phone: +1-415-536-5221 fax:+1-415-536-5210 > personal website: http://www.lisanza.net/ -- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/