Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 60844 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jun 2001 20:38:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org Received: (qmail 60779 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2001 20:38:18 -0000 Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 13:37:54 -0700 From: Justin Erenkrantz To: new-httpd@apache.org Cc: dev@apr.apache.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove ap_parseHTTPdate Message-ID: <20010605133754.H21860@ebuilt.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from cliffwoolley@yahoo.com on Tue, Jun 05, 2001 at 04:15:29PM -0400 X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1-pre3 (http://amavis.org/) X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Tue, Jun 05, 2001 at 04:15:29PM -0400, Cliff Woolley wrote: > On Tue, 5 Jun 2001, dean gaudet wrote: > > > this would seem like an OK time to change the function name to something > > more in line with other names in ap/apr... such as ap_parse_http_date. > > (but include a comment indicating the old name somewhere so it's easy to > > find for those of us who grok foreign programs by doing recursive greps :) > > apr_date_http_parse should be in line with the current standard, I think. > And yes, it should probably go in apu_compat.h or whatever. Good point. I'm going to do: apr_date_parse_http apr_date_parse_rfc apr_date_checkmask I'll commit into apr and then I'll repost my patch to new-httpd. -- justin