httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From <...@covalent.net>
Subject Re: Tagging the tree: 2 Showstoppers
Date Thu, 28 Jun 2001 05:00:19 GMT

>   first, would some else verify that autoindex and negotiation now work properly
> from cvs/head in Apache 2.0?  Also, would someone else comment on my observation
> below?  Once those are gone, I'm all for tagging 2.0.19.

They both work.

I am leaving everything else for tomorrow.  Regardless of any other
issues, this build is 100 times better than the last two releases, and it
has been too long since we had a beta.  I have now been working for over
14 hours today, or I would have looked into the two issues below in more
detail.  I am just out of energy right now though.  :-(

Ryan

> > >   --- request.c 2001/06/27 20:44:00 1.9
> > >   +++ request.c 2001/06/27 20:46:52 1.10
> > >   +    fill_in_sub_req_vars(rnew, r, next_filter);
> > >
> > >        rnew->per_dir_config = r->server->lookup_defaults;
> >
> > This assignment only occured in ap_sub_req_method_uri(), shouldn't this
> > also occur for ap_sub_req_lookup_file/dirent() ???
> >
> >
> > >   +    fill_in_sub_req_vars(rnew, r, next_filter);
> > >
> > >        rnew->chunked        = r->chunked;
> >
> > This assignment only occured in ap_sub_req_lookup_file(), shouldn't it
> > also occur for ap_sub_req_method_uri?!?
> >
> > If they were supposed to be common, they should just be added to the
> > new fill_in_sub_req_vars() fn.
> >
> > Bill
> >
> >
>
>


_____________________________________________________________________________
Ryan Bloom                        	rbb@apache.org
Covalent Technologies			rbb@covalent.net
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------


Mime
View raw message