httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From GOMEZ Henri <hgo...@slib.fr>
Subject RE: Apache 2.0.18 problem with mod_jk and
Date Fri, 08 Jun 2001 21:52:29 GMT
I'll redo my test with Apache 2.0.16 and tell you
more after that :)

-
Henri Gomez                 ___[_]____
EMAIL : hgomez@slib.fr        (. .)                     
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD    ...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 



>-----Original Message-----
>From: Cliff Woolley [mailto:cliffwoolley@yahoo.com]
>Sent: Friday, June 08, 2001 11:52 PM
>To: new-httpd@apache.org
>Subject: RE: Apache 2.0.18 problem with mod_jk and 
>
>
>On Fri, 8 Jun 2001, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
>
>>
>> >> I didn't have problem with static page.
>> >
>> >That would follow.  The bug is generally only seen when 
>subrequests are
>> >involved (eg, mod_include's include virtual and exec cgi 
>are broken by
>> >this bug), because the file/mmap/etc buckets from the 
>subrequest which
>> >should get passed back up to the main request go out of scope.
>>
>> Could you explain me why lynx and netscape didn't have this sort
>> of problem ? When I look the packet using ethereal they seems
>> to be very similar. 2 packets (600 + 5)...
>
>No, I can't.  That's why I said I wasn't 100% sure that this 
>is the same
>issue... just 95%.  ;-)
>
>--Cliff
>
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------
>   Cliff Woolley
>   cliffwoolley@yahoo.com
>   Charlottesville, VA
>
>

Mime
View raw message