Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 90597 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2001 11:40:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org Received: (qmail 90039 invoked from network); 10 May 2001 11:40:26 -0000 Message-Id: <5.0.0.25.2.20010510134511.02efac70@mail.cz> X-Sender: cynic@mail.cz X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0 Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 13:47:07 +0200 To: new-httpd@apache.org From: Cynic Subject: Re: Proposed Code Freeze for 1.3.20 In-Reply-To: <071001c0d909$3fb42ec0$94c0b0d0@roweclan.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N If you mean the build failure, then it seems to be fixed. I built a fresh snapshot yesterday, and it works. No real tests, but at least it runs and serves HTML + PHP pages on several VHosts. Oh, and BTW, it's on NT 4. At 06:25 10.5. 2001, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote the following: -------------------------------------------------------------- >From: >Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 11:22 PM > > >> On Wed, 9 May 2001, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: >> >> > I know Roy's model changes things a bit, and we can always go back >> > and tag the state of the tree as of midnight tonight, but... >> > >> > can we please freeze development now excepting fixes to absolutely broken stuff? >> >> Isn't the psprintf stuff still broken? > >I believe I just patched it for Win32 several days ago (you are asking about the >isnan() and isinf() tests?) > >Would _everyone_ please validate several platforms, please, and status the list?!? > >Bill ------end of quote------ cynic@mail.cz ------------- And the eyes of them both were opened and they saw that their files were world readable and writable, so they chmoded 600 their files. - Book of Installation chapt 3 sec 7