Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 92171 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2001 20:54:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org Received: (qmail 92011 invoked from network); 4 May 2001 20:54:32 -0000 Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 13:53:08 -0700 From: "Roy T. Fielding" To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: Re: [RFC] InodeEtag option Message-ID: <20010504135308.B997@waka.ebuilt.net> Mail-Followup-To: "Roy T. Fielding" , new-httpd@apache.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.13-current-20010115i In-Reply-To: ; from PEDietz@West.com on Fri, May 04, 2001 at 01:31:59PM -0500 X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1-pre3 (http://amavis.org/) X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 01:31:59PM -0500, Dietz, Phil E. wrote: > If the concensus says "Please don't Extend Options", I will provide this > patch as a directive. Options will not be extended in 1.3.x. That isn't an option because it would break binary compatibility in a severe way, beyond the fact that we decided not to further extend options about five years ago. ....Roy