Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 52007 invoked by uid 500); 15 May 2001 16:02:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org Received: (qmail 51902 invoked from network); 15 May 2001 16:01:51 -0000 Message-ID: <01bf01c0dd59$4a6fc280$bd431b09@sashimi> From: "Bill Stoddard" To: , "William A. Rowe, Jr." References: <016101c0dd44$16afaba0$bd431b09@sashimi> <009e01c0dd48$f79959a0$94c0b0d0@roweclan.net> Subject: Re: Is this an Apache 1.3 bug or a config problem? Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 12:08:33 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N So you are saying this is a bug for sure? It is east to update r->server->port with what is in the local_addr->sin_port field right before calling new_connection(). There is code in http_main.c that does just that for some platforms. Not sure what the implications are though... Bill > The bug is documented in STATUS. Care to research :-? > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bill Stoddard" > To: > Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 8:36 AM > Subject: Is this an Apache 1.3 bug or a config problem? > > > > At global scope I have the following config: > > > > Port 80 > > Listen 8080 > > > > As documented, Apache listens on port 8080 (the Port setting is ignored and > > the server will not listen on port 80). Here is the bug... If I use the %p > > log option to log the port the inbound request was received on, port 80 is > > logged (not port 8080 as expected). r->server->port is set to 80. This > > looks like plain goofy behaviour to me. > > > > Bill > > > > >