httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ian Holsman <I...@cnet.com>
Subject RE: Tagging Apache 2.0 for beta candidate
Date Fri, 18 May 2001 22:49:20 GMT
I've got the 2.0.18 (+proxy) running on Solaris 2.8

Reverse Proxying is working
I'm seeing some problems going to apple.com and cnet.com (the akamai thing)
I don't think this should hold up building a single tarball, we just need
to stick a note that akamized sites won't work with properly

..Ian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:admin@rowe-clan.net]
> Sent: Fri, May 18, 2001 3:16 PM
> To: new-httpd@apache.org; William A. Rowe, Jr.
> Subject: Re: Tagging Apache 2.0 for beta candidate
> 
> 
> From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <admin@rowe-clan.net>
> Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 4:58 PM
> 
> 
> > From: "Bill Stoddard" <bill@wstoddard.com>
> > Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 3:22 PM
> > 
> > I'm not suggesting we retag the httpd-2.0 tree!!!  Just 
> provide a single tarball
> > for folks to jump on this module in this beta.
> > 
> > > Since the tree is relatively stable now and we do not 
> freeze development before 
> > > tagging a tree, now seems to be a good time to try for a beta.  
> > > It is not a big deal to roll the proxy
> > > tarball and make it available to work with 2.0.18. We can 
> include it next
> > > time around.  
> > 
> > Why not simply tag proxy, [SAME TAG!] and add it to the 
> tarball?  How hard
> > is that?
> 
> I've just slapped the APACHE_2_0_18 tag on the httpd-proxy 
> tree, effective the same
> timetable as httpd-2.0's tag.
> 
> If the modproxy folks want to check out the proxy tree, grab 
> the tarball, insert 
> proxy-2.0 into that package, and retar it as 
> httpd-proxy-2.0.18.tar I believe that
> could make everyone happy, no?
> 
> If that package isn't up to snuff, then we release the 
> non-proxy tarball as the
> beta, instead.  And ITMT figure out how to release a single 
> tarball easily.
> 
> Since FirstBill has limited time, it's not too much to ask 
> this of proxy folk,
> who are more ready to assure the package builds.
> 
> Objections?
> 
> Bill
> 

Mime
View raw message