httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "William A. Rowe, Jr." <>
Subject Re: Tagging Apache 2.0 for beta candidate
Date Fri, 18 May 2001 22:15:59 GMT
From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <>
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 4:58 PM

> From: "Bill Stoddard" <>
> Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 3:22 PM
> I'm not suggesting we retag the httpd-2.0 tree!!!  Just provide a single tarball
> for folks to jump on this module in this beta.
> > Since the tree is relatively stable now and we do not freeze development before

> > tagging a tree, now seems to be a good time to try for a beta.  
> > It is not a big deal to roll the proxy
> > tarball and make it available to work with 2.0.18. We can include it next
> > time around.  
> Why not simply tag proxy, [SAME TAG!] and add it to the tarball?  How hard
> is that?

I've just slapped the APACHE_2_0_18 tag on the httpd-proxy tree, effective the same
timetable as httpd-2.0's tag.

If the modproxy folks want to check out the proxy tree, grab the tarball, insert 
proxy-2.0 into that package, and retar it as httpd-proxy-2.0.18.tar I believe that
could make everyone happy, no?

If that package isn't up to snuff, then we release the non-proxy tarball as the
beta, instead.  And ITMT figure out how to release a single tarball easily.

Since FirstBill has limited time, it's not too much to ask this of proxy folk,
who are more ready to assure the package builds.



View raw message