httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Bill Stoddard" <b...@wstoddard.com>
Subject Re: Tagging Apache 2.0 for beta candidate
Date Mon, 21 May 2001 20:33:16 GMT

> On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 12:20:17PM -0700, rbb@covalent.net wrote:
> > On 21 May 2001, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> >
> > > "Bill Stoddard" <bill@wstoddard.com> writes:
> > >
> > > > I think we have a good shot at a beta candidate. I plan to tag the
tree
> > > > early this afternoon (ET) unless I hear objections.
> > >
> > > I think it is fine for that tarball to go out as a beta as long as we
> > > make a patch available for srclib/apr-util/Makefile.in to use with RH
> > > 7.1 (and whatever other platforms may be affected).
> >
> > Whoah.  We have a tarball that we know doesn't build on RH 7.1 at the
very
> > least.  That is not a beta tarball.  That would be an alpha tarball.
> > Release it as an alpha, at least that's my vote.
>
> Agreed. +1 on alpha. -0 on beta.
>
> (sounds like mod_dav_fs wasn't configuring properly either)
>

Any objections to making binaries available, or is that the definition of a
beta ? :-) I want to get the server out in the world for folks to pound on.

Bill


Mime
View raw message