Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 18227 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2001 16:13:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org Received: (qmail 17913 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2001 16:13:42 -0000 From: TOKILEY@aol.com Message-ID: <2f.143487db.2815ae97@aol.com> Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 12:13:11 EDT Subject: Re: Feedback about the sgi patches issue. (vol 4) To: new-httpd@apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 3.0 16-bit for Windows sub 86 X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N In a message dated 01-04-23 10:32:56 EDT, you write: > Three more messages from the larger community posted to new-httpd over > the last few weeks. Ezmlm is configured to divert postings from > non-subscribers to the moderator, that's currently me. I have replied > to all of these. > > - ben > > ps. I've been out on vacation the last week. FWIW... The Linux Mandrake project already incorporates most of Mr. Michael Abbot's original 'speedup' patches into their copy of Linux but be forewarned... from the word go they have 'patched the patches' and are still doing so and these changes were never posted back to Mr. Abbot or the AAP. Some of what they did was just bug fixing for the original patches but they have added even more optimizations of their own ( and they work ). Even as recently as last week they 'rewrote' the file handle hot-caching to make it more compatible with mod_gzip because they are planning on shipping mod_gzip with the Server. I only mention that as an example of what is happening there. mod_gzip is NOT the issue or the point of this message. The point is that if you are still considering adding any of the patches to Apache then you might want to download the 'Apache Advanced Extranet' Server that comes with Linux Mandrake 7.2 and use THOSE performance patches because at this point they are actually 'better patches than the original patches' and AFAIK the AAP project has ABENDED. Yours... Kevin Kiley