Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org
From: Jim Jagielski <jim@jaguNET.com>
Message-Id: <200104201720.NAA14959@devsys.jaguNET.com>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in?
To: new-httpd@apache.org
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 13:20:31 -0400 (EDT)
Reply-To: jim@jaguNET.com
In-Reply-To: <200104201712.NAA18057@shado.jaguNET.com> from "Chuck Murcko" at
 Apr 20, 2001 01:11:43 PM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Except that we did. It's been something 1st brought up and considered
at least 3 years ago, except we used the FreeBSD "ports" analogy,
which is much better IMO :)

Chuck Murcko wrote:
> 
> I think nobody answered because this is pretty obviously the next Right 
> Thing to do in distributing httpd and we're to embarassed to admit we 
> didn't think of it first. 8^)
> 
> On Thursday, April 19, 2001, at 05:14 PM, Theo Schlossnagle wrote:
> 
> >
> > Let me throw in a different perspective of things.
> 
> ...
> 
> 
> > Thoughts?
> >
> 
> Chuck Murcko
> Topsail Group
> http://www.topsail.org/
> 


-- 
===========================================================================
   Jim Jagielski   [|]   jim@jaguNET.com   [|]   http://www.jaguNET.com/
          "Hell is hot, that's never been disputed by anybody."