Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 89240 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2001 20:40:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org Received: (qmail 89221 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2001 20:40:19 -0000 Message-ID: <04a801c0cf5b$8eb4efd0$e4421b09@raleigh.ibm.com> From: "Bill Stoddard" To: References: <20010426212947.G921@waka.ebuilt.net> <20010427130355.P1374@lyra.org> Subject: Re: global pools Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 16:49:30 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N +1 ----- Original Message ----- From: Greg Stein To: ; Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 4:03 PM Subject: Re: global pools > On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 09:29:47PM -0700, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > >... > > Is there some reason that apr can't give us the global pool, or allow > > us to give it the global pool? > > I can't think of one, so I'd be fine with seeing apr_initialize() return a > global pool. > > Cheers, > -g > > -- > Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/ >