Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 96308 invoked by uid 500); 17 Apr 2001 17:55:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org Received: (qmail 96242 invoked from network); 17 Apr 2001 17:55:39 -0000 Message-ID: <011a01c0c767$82c60bb0$7f00a8c0@VAIO> From: "David Reid" To: References: <005201c0c75d$35506100$7f00a8c0@VAIO> <3ADC790E.DB05B68@covalent.net> Subject: Re: Multi-protocol patch, part 1 Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 18:54:52 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N > David, I know some people (ISPs) who do around 6 months of > installation testing before they make somethings operational. > These are mostly done for core network features, but also > for every service they use. > > I don't think they would mind to wait a month if they get > what they want in 2.0. The mind earlier doing the operational > testing twice. I had a response written, but after reading it I decided it was continuing the negativity of this thread so I'll save some bandwidth. We all do what we want (as Ryan said). Have fun. david