Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 21272 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2001 15:49:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org Received: (qmail 21069 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2001 15:49:57 -0000 Subject: =?US-ASCII?Q?Re: [PATCH] mpm=5Fquery=5F2?= From: Peter Moore Reply-To: Peter Moore Message-ID: <000381c0ee489c95_mailit@www.cdws.com.au> References: <3AD5C8CD.9A16C50C@covalent.net> Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2001 01:49:21 +1000 X-Mailer: BeatWare Mail-It 3.0 X-BeOS-Platform: Intel or clone To: new-httpd@apache.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N > >You definitly have not understood the use of it. >But that does not matter. I know you act like the APACHE >2.0 police. Even though i don't contribute code (yet) i think that you should really understand that there are people in this group who understand the way the core Apache works and they are not going to allow snippets into the repository just because you think your understanding of the world is better than the knowledge of the way that Apache works that the rest of the "major contributors" have. > >I now start thinking that the MPM_TYPE should be an MPM_DESCR. >and for what the ap_show_mpm goes it can use the mpm_query to >provide the proper values. IMHO, the ap_show_mpm >is a not wrapper around ap_mpm_query. > I have to disagree.....a description and type are a lot different....from what i have been looking at in the code anyway. regards peter ******************************************** Peter Moore Director CDWS ACN 070 000 065 peter@cdws.com.au http://www.cdws.com.au/ Mobile +61 4 111 86230 (in Aus 04 111 86230) ICQ 926967 (old) 95022055 (new - Oct 18, 2000) ********************************************