httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Bill Stoddard" <>
Subject Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/loggers mod_log_config.c
Date Sat, 21 Apr 2001 00:03:40 GMT

> On Fri, 20 Apr 2001, Bill Stoddard wrote:
> > Debugging another problem related to this patch got me to thinking....
> >
> > <vent>
> > Is this patch pedantic?  I mean, what is wrong with letting mod_log_config handle
the %c
> > just as it always has?  We are trying to file every single little nit in its tight
little spot
> > the expense of maintainability.  This code base is getting seriously complex. Stuff
like this
> > it even worse.
> > </vent>
> This patch is important, because it means that if I want to log something,
> I don't have to modify mod_log_config.  Think of cookie logging.  Why do
> we enable cookie logging if mod_usertrack isn't in the server?  I want to
> be able to extend logging without modifying another module.
> yes, this may be a bit more complex, but it puts the onus of logging a
> feature on the code that implements the feature.  I would much rather do
> that, then to put the onus on a completely unrelated logging module.

I very much like the idea of optional functions. I was specifically questioning moving the
handling from mod_log_config to the core.  Gotta get active writing some docs cause some of
stuff is seriously complicated. :-)


View raw message