Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 99437 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2001 18:19:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org Received: (qmail 99404 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2001 18:19:27 -0000 Message-ID: <3A9E9295.ACD750C8@algroup.co.uk> Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2001 18:19:01 +0000 From: Ben Laurie X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] ap_r* model. References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N rbb@covalent.net wrote: > > I have asked for people to vote on this subject informally, and it never > gets anywhere, because nobody responds. To that end, and because I want > closure on this, I am calling for a formal vote now. > > How do we implement ap_r? > > [ ] As a macro wrapper around ap_f* and the r->bb brigade > [ ] Using the OLD_WRITE filter > > The advantages and disadvantages of each of these models has been > discussed on this list for weeks. I can give a brief synopsis, or people > can check the archives. People on this list should be able to answer any > questions about the two models, so that there is no confusion when people > vote. I'd like to request the brief synopsis. Although I did read the mails at the time, I ran out of storage capacity to keep them in my head. Sorry! Cheers, Ben. -- http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html "There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff ApacheCon 2001! http://ApacheCon.com/