Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 77006 invoked by uid 500); 5 Mar 2001 12:16:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org Received: (qmail 76345 invoked from network); 5 Mar 2001 12:16:27 -0000 Message-ID: <01c801c0a56d$3e6af870$011aa8c0@godzilla> From: "David Reid" To: References: Subject: Re: apache 2.0.11 - tag 2.0.12? Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2001 12:10:02 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N FWIW, peter Moore has just sent me more detail on the problem that BeOS seems to have with large files, and it looks like 1.1 has a problem whereas 1.0 is fine. Could be related to Brian's issue. I've asked him to follow up with more detail, but his email is peter@cdws.com.au if you want to talk directly. The file that's barfing is the large image on http://bp6.cdws.com.au/bp6cpu.html (http://bp6.cdws.com.au/images/screen1.tga) Of course, given that both peter and Brian are in Australia, maybe it's just a southern hemisphere thing :) david > > Can you give me a sample set of request headers to try to duplicate this? > > I've tried it with a 128KB file with MMAP and SENDFILE both turned off > using HTTP/1.1 with and without chunking, and it still works on Linux. >