Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 6947 invoked by uid 500); 5 Mar 2001 01:29:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org Received: (qmail 6931 invoked from network); 5 Mar 2001 01:29:20 -0000 Message-ID: <01b801c0a514$8d10eec0$2d060e09@SASHIMI> From: "Bill Stoddard" To: References: <3AA2C98F.CA790F99@Golux.Com> Subject: Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server core.c Makefile.in connection.c Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2001 20:35:18 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N > rbb@covalent.net wrote: > > > > Assuming that you do not, I plan on continuing to work on > > this, because it is what I care about right now. > > Well, it *does* ought to be done.. *shrug* I personally > do not have any investment in when we go beta, so AFAIC > this should stay in and the beta can just wait until > everything is stable and people are comfortable. > -- It's in so leave it in. But I think Ken does bring up a valid point. Jeff and I spend a good bit of our development time fixing compile breaks, many which are introduced by 'cosmetic' changes to the code or build environment. In general, folks have been MUCH less disciplined about what they commit to Apache 2.0 than what they commit to 1.3. It's time for that to change. I would request that you (all of us) try to compile our commits against multiple OSes as a courtesy to the other active developers. Bill