From new-httpd-return-14354-apmail-new-httpd-archive=apache.org@apache.org Mon Mar 05 16:22:32 2001 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 88732 invoked by uid 500); 5 Mar 2001 16:22:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org Received: (qmail 88721 invoked from network); 5 Mar 2001 16:22:31 -0000 Errors-To: Message-ID: <0a5101c0a590$647c3830$96c0b0d0@roweclan.net> Reply-To: "William A. Rowe, Jr." From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." To: References: <00dc01c0a37a$eaf0ef90$011aa8c0@godzilla> <20010305170726.B4197@deejai2.mch.fsc.net> Subject: Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 acinclude.m4 Makefile.in Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2001 10:21:53 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N I'd adopted Apache2.0 for the default on Win32, but I'm happy to change. Bill ----- Original Message ----- From: "Martin Kraemer" To: Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 10:07 AM Subject: Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 acinclude.m4 Makefile.in > On Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 12:42:11AM -0000, David Reid wrote: > > > > I vote for /usr/local/apache. > > > > > > ++1, but can we use /usr/local/apache2? > > > > +1 for /usr/local/apache2 > > +1. > > Martin > -- > | Fujitsu Siemens > | 81730 Munich, Germany >