Mailing list archives: March 2001

Site index · List index
Message list1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · Next »Thread · Author · Date
Ian Holsman Re: Apache 2.0.12 ready for testing Wed, 28 Feb, 01:56
GOMEZ Henri RE: 1.3 & c++ DSO Wed, 28 Feb, 23:45
Martin Kraemer Re: [PATCH] update to ap_unparse_uri_components() Thu, 01 Mar, 08:47
Frédéric Bonjour Re: httpd 1.3.19 + proxy Thu, 01 Mar, 09:56
Martin Kraemer Re: httpd 1.3.19 + proxy Thu, 01 Mar, 13:09
Frédéric Bonjour Re: httpd 1.3.19 + proxy Thu, 01 Mar, 13:11
Frédéric Bonjour Re: httpd 1.3.19 + proxy Thu, 01 Mar, 13:12
Martin Kraemer Re: [APACHE-1.3.19] Tagged & Rolled Thu, 01 Mar, 13:14
Martin Kraemer Re: [APACHE-1.3.19] Tagged & Rolled Thu, 01 Mar, 13:15
Bill Stoddard Re: 1.3.19 HTTP/1.1 proxy patch - was:Re: httpd 1.3.19 + proxy Thu, 01 Mar, 14:00
Jeffrey W. Baker Re: [PATCH] update to ap_unparse_uri_components() Thu, 01 Mar, 15:17
Greg Ames Re: how many workers to start initially with threaded mpm? Thu, 01 Mar, 15:52
r..@covalent.net Re: how many workers to start initially with threaded mpm? Thu, 01 Mar, 16:06
r..@covalent.net [VOTE] ap_r* model. Thu, 01 Mar, 17:20
Bill Stoddard Re: [VOTE] ap_r* model. Thu, 01 Mar, 17:48
Dietz, Phil E. RE: [RFC] InodeEtag option Thu, 01 Mar, 17:50
r..@covalent.net Re: [VOTE] ap_r* model. Thu, 01 Mar, 17:55
Ian Holsman some reasons why Apache 2.0 threaded is slower than prefork Thu, 01 Mar, 17:58
Joshua Slive RE: [RFC] InodeEtag option Thu, 01 Mar, 17:59
Ben Laurie Re: [VOTE] ap_r* model. Thu, 01 Mar, 18:19
William A. Rowe, Jr. Re: [RFC] InodeEtag option Thu, 01 Mar, 18:32
Cliff Woolley Re: some reasons why Apache 2.0 threaded is slower than prefork Thu, 01 Mar, 18:40
Cliff Woolley Re: some reasons why Apache 2.0 threaded is slower than prefork Thu, 01 Mar, 18:46
Bill Stoddard Re: some reasons why Apache 2.0 threaded is slower than prefork Thu, 01 Mar, 18:47
r..@covalent.net Re: [VOTE] ap_r* model. Thu, 01 Mar, 18:59
Jeff Trawick Re: some reasons why Apache 2.0 threaded is slower than prefork Thu, 01 Mar, 19:13
Jeff Trawick Re: some reasons why Apache 2.0 threaded is slower than prefork Thu, 01 Mar, 19:15
Rodent of Unusual Size Re: [VOTE] ap_r* model. Thu, 01 Mar, 19:23
William A. Rowe, Jr. Re: some reasons why Apache 2.0 threaded is slower than prefork Thu, 01 Mar, 19:24
Bill Stoddard Re: some reasons why Apache 2.0 threaded is slower than prefork Thu, 01 Mar, 19:26
Cliff Woolley Re: some reasons why Apache 2.0 threaded is slower than prefork Thu, 01 Mar, 19:35
r..@covalent.net Re: [VOTE] ap_r* model. Thu, 01 Mar, 19:35
Sander van Zoest Contributing Binary Distributions? Thu, 01 Mar, 20:26
Rodent of Unusual Size Re: [VOTE] ap_r* model. Thu, 01 Mar, 20:39
Rodent of Unusual Size Re: some reasons why Apache 2.0 threaded is slower than prefork Thu, 01 Mar, 20:42
Marc Slemko RE: [RFC] InodeEtag option Thu, 01 Mar, 20:44
William A. Rowe, Jr. Re: Contributing Binary Distributions? Thu, 01 Mar, 20:47
William A. Rowe, Jr. Re: [VOTE] ap_r* model. Thu, 01 Mar, 20:51
Lars Eilebrecht Re: IPv6 in apache-1.3? Thu, 01 Mar, 21:39
Bill Stoddard Re: some reasons why Apache 2.0 threaded is slower than prefork Thu, 01 Mar, 21:44
Bill Stoddard Re: some reasons why Apache 2.0 threaded is slower than prefork Thu, 01 Mar, 21:49
Greg Stein Re: [VOTE] ap_r* model. Thu, 01 Mar, 21:50
Greg Stein Re: [VOTE] ap_r* model. Thu, 01 Mar, 21:52
Greg Stein Re: [VOTE] ap_r* model. Thu, 01 Mar, 22:01
William A. Rowe, Jr. Test Message - please don't moderate in Thu, 01 Mar, 22:06
William A. Rowe, Jr. Re: [VOTE] ap_r* model. Thu, 01 Mar, 22:13
r..@covalent.net Re: [VOTE] ap_r* model. Thu, 01 Mar, 22:17
Rodent of Unusual Size Re: [VOTE] ap_r* model. Thu, 01 Mar, 22:21
Greg Stein Re: some reasons why Apache 2.0 threaded is slower than prefork Thu, 01 Mar, 22:23
Greg Stein Re: Contributing Binary Distributions? Thu, 01 Mar, 22:40
Bill Stoddard Re: Contributing Binary Distributions? Thu, 01 Mar, 22:58
William A. Rowe, Jr. 1.3.19-win32 binaries available for testing Thu, 01 Mar, 23:33
William A. Rowe, Jr. [Announce] Win32 Installer Repository Fri, 02 Mar, 00:25
Bill Stoddard Re: [Announce] Win32 Installer Repository Fri, 02 Mar, 01:42
Ben Hyde Re: Test Message - please don't moderate in Fri, 02 Mar, 01:57
Jeff Trawick Re: some reasons why Apache 2.0 threaded is slower than prefork Fri, 02 Mar, 01:58
William A. Rowe, Jr. Re: 1.3.19-win32 binaries available for testing Fri, 02 Mar, 03:54
Jeffrey A. Stuart RE: [VOTE] ap_r* model. Fri, 02 Mar, 05:28
r..@covalent.net Re: [Patch]: Make mod_include pass large files in chunks Fri, 02 Mar, 06:53
Greg Stein Re: some reasons why Apache 2.0 threaded is slower than prefork Fri, 02 Mar, 08:15
Greg Stein Re: [VOTE] ap_r* model. Fri, 02 Mar, 09:01
Greg Stein Re: [VOTE] ap_r* model. Fri, 02 Mar, 09:18
Jeff Trawick Re: some reasons why Apache 2.0 threaded is slower than prefork Fri, 02 Mar, 10:33
Greg Stein Re: some reasons why Apache 2.0 threaded is slower than prefork Fri, 02 Mar, 11:52
Martin Kraemer Re: 1.3.19-win32 binaries available for testing Fri, 02 Mar, 12:01
Martin Kraemer Re: 1.3.19-win32 binaries available for testing Fri, 02 Mar, 12:03
David Reid Re: [VOTE] ap_r* model. Fri, 02 Mar, 12:38
David Reid Re: some reasons why Apache 2.0 threaded is slower than prefork Fri, 02 Mar, 12:39
Jeff Trawick Re: cvs commit: apache-1.3/src/main http_main.c Fri, 02 Mar, 13:05
Ben Laurie Re: [VOTE] ap_r* model. Fri, 02 Mar, 13:34
William A. Rowe, Jr. Re: 1.3.19-win32 binaries available for testing Fri, 02 Mar, 13:39
Ben Laurie Re: some reasons why Apache 2.0 threaded is slower than prefork Fri, 02 Mar, 13:40
William A. Rowe, Jr. Re: 1.3.19-win32 binaries available for testing Fri, 02 Mar, 13:43
Bill Stoddard Re: [VOTE] ap_r* model. Fri, 02 Mar, 14:09
r..@covalent.net Re: [VOTE] ap_r* model. Fri, 02 Mar, 14:38
r..@covalent.net Re: [VOTE] ap_r* model. Fri, 02 Mar, 14:42
r..@covalent.net Re: [VOTE] ap_r* model. Fri, 02 Mar, 15:04
William A. Rowe, Jr. Re: [Announce] Win32 Installer Repository Fri, 02 Mar, 15:07
William A. Rowe, Jr. Re: [VOTE] ap_r* model. Fri, 02 Mar, 15:19
William A. Rowe, Jr. Re: [VOTE] ap_r* model. Fri, 02 Mar, 15:22
Martin Kraemer Re: cvs commit: apache-1.3/src/main http_main.c Fri, 02 Mar, 15:51
John Thompson Re: some reasons why Apache 2.0 threaded is slower than prefork Fri, 02 Mar, 16:04
r..@covalent.net Re: [VOTE] ap_r* model. Fri, 02 Mar, 16:15
William A. Rowe, Jr. Fw: Win32/Apache 1.3.17-19 problems Fri, 02 Mar, 16:36
Brad Nicholes [PATCH] Apache 1.3 httpd.conf-dist-nw Fri, 02 Mar, 17:01
r..@covalent.net Re: [VOTE] ap_r* model. Fri, 02 Mar, 18:04
Bill Stoddard Re: [VOTE] ap_r* model. Fri, 02 Mar, 18:26
Jeff Trawick Re: cvs commit: apache-1.3/src/main http_main.c Fri, 02 Mar, 19:14
Greg Ames Re: some reasons why Apache 2.0 threaded is slower than prefork Fri, 02 Mar, 19:42
Rodent of Unusual Size Re: [VOTE] ap_r* model. Fri, 02 Mar, 20:28
Ben Hyde Re: Contributing Binary Distributions? Fri, 02 Mar, 20:38
Forest Come-Peace Re: some reasons why Apache 2.0 threaded is slower than prefork Fri, 02 Mar, 21:15
Greg Stein Re: [VOTE] ap_r* model. Fri, 02 Mar, 21:21
r..@covalent.net Re: [VOTE] ap_r* model. Fri, 02 Mar, 21:56
William A. Rowe, Jr. Re: [VOTE] ap_r* model. Fri, 02 Mar, 22:19
r..@covalent.net Re: [VOTE] ap_r* model. Fri, 02 Mar, 22:27
Martin Kraemer Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 acinclude.m4 Makefile.in Fri, 02 Mar, 22:39
Bill Stoddard Re: [VOTE] ap_r* model. Fri, 02 Mar, 22:55
r..@covalent.net Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 acinclude.m4 Makefile.in Fri, 02 Mar, 23:00
Rodent of Unusual Size Re: [VOTE] ap_r* model. Fri, 02 Mar, 23:01
Message list1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · Next »Thread · Author · Date
Box list
Aug 2008160
Jul 2008120
Jun 2008255
May 2008319
Apr 2008404
Mar 2008203
Feb 2008356
Jan 2008423
Dec 2007336
Nov 2007270
Oct 2007382
Sep 2007519
Aug 2007391
Jul 2007208
Jun 2007267
May 2007309
Apr 2007277
Mar 2007308
Feb 2007315
Jan 2007304
Dec 2006280
Nov 2006237
Oct 2006394
Sep 2006286
Aug 2006250
Jul 2006570
Jun 2006313
May 2006357
Apr 2006548
Mar 2006408
Feb 2006328
Jan 2006438
Dec 2005613
Nov 2005711
Oct 2005598
Sep 2005456
Aug 2005776
Jul 2005457
Jun 2005384
May 2005321
Apr 2005359
Mar 2005466
Feb 2005380
Jan 2005206
Dec 2004398
Nov 2004538
Oct 2004371
Sep 2004539
Aug 2004527
Jul 2004325
Jun 2004468
May 2004317
Apr 2004234
Mar 2004606
Feb 2004357
Jan 2004358
Dec 2003344
Nov 2003580
Oct 2003336
Sep 2003272
Aug 2003262
Jul 2003323
Jun 2003424
May 2003447
Apr 2003355
Mar 2003684
Feb 2003570
Jan 2003534
Dec 2002443
Nov 2002531
Oct 2002749
Sep 2002901
Aug 2002802
Jul 2002716
Jun 2002910
May 20021024
Apr 20021369
Mar 20021093
Feb 20021143
Jan 20021069
Dec 2001682
Nov 20011268
Oct 20011110
Sep 20011258
Aug 20011708
Jul 20011052
Jun 2001737
May 2001644
Apr 2001957
Mar 2001611
Feb 20011465
Jan 20011416
Dec 2000906
Nov 20001082
Oct 20001016
Sep 2000645
Aug 2000729
Jul 20001016
Jun 20001602
May 20001092
Apr 20001358
Mar 20001504
Feb 2000586
Jan 2000836
Dec 1999590
Nov 1999601
Oct 1999746
Sep 1999378
Aug 19991034
Jul 1999678
Jun 1999626
May 1999619
Apr 1999697
Mar 1999678
Feb 1999325
Jan 1999794
Dec 1998575
Nov 1998407
Oct 1998475
Sep 1998737
Aug 1998557
Jul 1998907
Jun 1998858
May 1998958
Apr 19981234
Mar 19981320
Feb 19981328
Jan 19981686
Dec 1997879
Nov 19971103
Oct 19971078
Sep 19971171
Aug 19971881
Jul 19971809
Jun 19971820
May 1997622
Apr 1997938
Mar 1997685
Feb 19971176
Jan 19971927
Dec 19961420
Nov 1996798
Oct 1996605
Sep 1996644
Aug 1996994
Jul 19961617
Jun 19961747
May 19961210
Apr 19961102
Mar 1996698
Feb 19961000
Jan 1996550
Dec 1995832
Nov 1995628
Oct 1995589
Sep 1995715
Aug 19951049
Jul 1995413
Jun 1995255
May 1995390
Apr 1995998
Mar 1995699