httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From <...@covalent.net>
Subject Re: apache 2.0.11 - tag 2.0.12?
Date Mon, 05 Mar 2001 15:49:13 GMT
On Tue, 6 Mar 2001, Brian Havard wrote:

> On Mon, 5 Mar 2001 06:56:37 -0800 (PST), rbb@covalent.net wrote:
>
> >> No need, I've think I've got to the bottom of it now. It appears that the
> >> OS/2 implementation of writev() chokes if the total bytes > 64k. It returns
> >> EINVAL but server/core.c:3189 says /* XXX: log the error */ rather than
> >> actually logging the error :-(
> >
> >Cool.
> >
> >> So what's a reliable way to ensure no more than 64k gets writev()'d? I
> >> guess I should break it up appropriately in apr_sendv() as it's most likely
> >> an OS/2 only problem.
> >
> >Could you do it in core_output_filter?  We should NEVER be writing that
> >much one time anyway, so putting it in the core should help us see it,
> >along with a debug message about writing too much?
>
> Well I noticed that the content length filter set aside ALL of
> mod_include's output. I guess that's why core_output_filter got hit with it
> all at once.

That's bogus.  The content length filter should almost NEVER set aside
that much data.  There is a bug there.

Ryan

_______________________________________________________________________________
Ryan Bloom                        	rbb@apache.org
406 29th St.
San Francisco, CA 94131
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Mime
View raw message