httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From <...@covalent.net>
Subject Re: apache 2.0.11 - tag 2.0.12?
Date Mon, 05 Mar 2001 01:21:05 GMT
On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, Brian Havard wrote:

> On Sun, 4 Mar 2001 09:49:48 -0800 (PST), rbb@covalent.net wrote:
>
> >On Sat, 24 Feb 2001, Brian Havard wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, 23 Feb 2001 14:21:22 -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> >>
> >> >The split of mod_proxy effectively broke the 2_0_11 release on Win32.  The
> >> >fix came very soon thereafter.
> >> >
> >> >I'd like to see us tag 2_0_12 just as soon as Brian indicates that HEAD
> >> >builds on OS2 after all the changes this week.  I'm seeing no issues building
> >> >on Win32, and presume we are putting to bed the Unix headaches from all
the
> >> >posts on that subject.
> >>
> >> Yeah, HEAD builds on OS/2 ok though the mod_include >64k bug still exists.
> >> Ryan, were you able to reproduce this?
> >
> >Where are we with this?  I can't reproduce it with any size file.  I even
> >went so far as to create a 10Meg file to try testing it.  Can you test
> >again with HEAD?  I believe that Paul's patch to send after 9k os data is
> >processed may fix this problem.
>
> I thought so too but no, it's still there. However I just noticed that it
> works ok if the request is for HTTP/1.0. It only breaks on HTTP/1.1 so I'm
> thinking perhaps the chunk filter or something it uses (like
> apr_brigade_split) is broken. I'll try to find some time to step through
> the code & figure it out.

Ahhhhh.....  I only tried with 1.0 requests.  Could this be a part of the
pipelined request stuff?  I may try to reproduce this on my computer
later, but I'm trying to finish moving code out of http.

Ryan

_______________________________________________________________________________
Ryan Bloom                        	rbb@apache.org
406 29th St.
San Francisco, CA 94131
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Mime
View raw message