httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From <>
Subject Re: [VOTE] ap_r* model.
Date Thu, 01 Mar 2001 19:35:59 GMT
On Thu, 1 Mar 2001, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:

> Consider the case of an existing (1.3) module that uses
> ap_r*.  The author's goal is to do as little as possible
> to make it work under 2.0.  It sounds as though the OLD_WRITE
> solution will do this; he can leave all his content-related
> calls along, and just upgrade the hooks.  The macro option
> requires him to learn about bucket brigades.
> Is that correct?

No.  Either way, the old ap_r* calls always work.  The module author only
needs to re-learn anything if they WANT to use the direct bucket calls.
If they stick with just ap_r*, there is nothing new in either model.


Ryan Bloom               
406 29th St.
San Francisco, CA 94131

View raw message