httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Dietz, Phil E." <PEDi...@West.com>
Subject RE: [RFC] InodeEtag option
Date Thu, 01 Mar 2001 17:50:34 GMT
No one has replied.  Any opinions ?

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	William A. Rowe, Jr. [SMTP:wrowe@rowe-clan.net]
> Sent:	Monday, February 26, 2001 3:17 PM
> To:	new-httpd@apache.org
> Subject:	Re: [RFC] InodeEtag option
> 
> From: "Rodent of Unusual Size" <Ken.Coar@Golux.Com>
> Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 3:01 PM
> 
> 
> > "Dietz, Phil E." wrote:
> > > 
> > > - the allow_options_t size increased to a long because all 8 bits
> > > of char were in use.
> > 
> > Ouch.  I think that has killed changes to Options in the past.
> 
> So do we
> 
> 1. bite the bullet and increment the mmn?
> 
> 2. add more_options as a long at the end of the structure, increment
>    the mmn, and perhaps some authors get away with ignoring the bump?
> 
> Bill

Mime
View raw message