Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 22:13:25 -0800 (PST)
From: rbb@covalent.net
To: new-httpd@apache.org, cliffwoolley@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: Can I take down apache.org?
In-Reply-To: <20010216060936.12310.qmail@web3206.mail.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0102152213020.25493-100000@koj>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

> --- rbb@covalent.net wrote:
> > I just requested this file on my server running Linux, through the
> > mod_include filter, without thd problem that I see when I request the page
> > from your machine.
> > 
> > What confuses me, is that it doesn't look like this is a problem with
> > sendfile on your machine, because it works without the filter.  I haven't
> > got a clue what is going on, but it looks like it is OS/2 specific.
> 
> This part actually makes sense... when he's serving the file static via sendfile, it
> makes it all the way down the filter chain as a file bucket.  When using mod_include,
> file_read() gets called, meaning no more file bucket.  I might be wrong, but OS/2 doesn't
> seem to have MMAP, so it's getting read by apr_read() into heap buckets of a couple KB
> each that are getting shuffled around.  Makes sense to me.  Assuming I'm right that OS/2
> doesn't have MMAP, it's interesting to note that OS/2 might be one of the few platforms
> using that particular code path in file_read().  Still, I wonder if this is a symptom of
> a lower-level problem with some APR function's implementation under OS/2, or if it's a
> symptom of not using MMAP.  Ryan, can you test on your machine with MMAP disabled?  Does
> yours still work in that case?

I'll do that first thing tomorrow.

Ryan

_______________________________________________________________________________
Ryan Bloom                        	rbb@apache.org
406 29th St.
San Francisco, CA 94131
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------