Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 90100 invoked by uid 500); 12 Feb 2001 09:29:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org Received: (qmail 90087 invoked from network); 12 Feb 2001 09:29:03 -0000 Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 10:28:40 +0100 From: Martin Kraemer To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: apache-1.3/src/main util_uri.c Message-ID: <20010212102840.A48181@deejai2.mch.fsc.net> References: <20010209085209.45393.qmail@apache.org> <20010210100744.V461@hand.dotat.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010210100744.V461@hand.dotat.at>; from dot@dotat.at on Sat, Feb 10, 2001 at 10:07:44AM +0000 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 4.2-RELEASE X-Organization: Fujitsu Siemens Computers (Muenchen, W.Germany) X-Disclaimer: THE COMMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS MESSAGE REFLECT THE VIEWS OF THE WRITER AND ARE NOT NECESSARILY THE VIEWS OF FUJITSU-SIEMENS COMPUTERS X-No-Junk-Mail: I do not want to get *any* junk mail. X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Sat, Feb 10, 2001 at 10:07:44AM +0000, Tony Finch wrote: > No! Why?! This is completely pointless!! There are over 30,000 lines > with tabs in the source tree so changes like this are STUPID. Yes. And no: coupla years ago, the "coding rules" of The Group stated that TABs should be avoided (because the Group never completely settled on The Truth of The Only Valid Tabstop Width of 8). Martin -- | Fujitsu Siemens | 81730 Munich, Germany