Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 74240 invoked by uid 500); 10 Feb 2001 01:29:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org Received: (qmail 74229 invoked from network); 10 Feb 2001 01:29:47 -0000 X-Authentication-Warning: kurgan.lyra.org: gstein set sender to gstein@lyra.org using -f Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2001 17:31:44 -0800 From: Greg Stein To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: Re: Rolling tomorrow, conditionally. Message-ID: <20010209173144.R26044@lyra.org> Mail-Followup-To: new-httpd@apache.org References: <008d01c092f5$70453340$95c0b0d0@roweclan.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <008d01c092f5$70453340$95c0b0d0@roweclan.net>; from wrowe@rowe-clan.net on Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 06:07:20PM -0600 X-URL: http://www.lyra.org/greg/ X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 06:07:20PM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > From: > Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 6:03 PM > > > This is just a quick heads up. I will be tagging and rolling again > > tomorrow sometime, assuming the server compiles and runs on BeOS. David Why not tag and roll, despite BeOS? A lot of people can still test any tarball that is provided. Sure, we won't call it "alpha" or "beta" quality, but that doesn't mean it should be totally ignored by everybody. > > has told me his is looking at it now, so if he gives the thumbs up, we > > will tag and roll tomorrow. The script for rolling has been checked in to > > httpd-site, but it still needs some work, I will keep updating it as we > > use it. > > > > If there are any other platforms that we already know don't work, please > > tell me know so that I don't waste my time rolling tomorrow. The whole point is that it shouldn't be a time waster :-) If we can get the process to "type these few commands; while waiting, go read email", then we're all set, and it doesn't matter how good or broken the tarball is. > I will be building and testing apache-2.0/win32 tonight. > > Please assure our Announcement contains the usual disclaimer that the beta 1 > has not yet been optimized for performance, and that the beta cycles will > continue to see improvements in performance and reliability. We don't know if it is beta. That comes later. Cheers, -g -- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/