Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2001 06:29:55 -0800
From: Greg Stein <gstein@lyra.org>
To: new-httpd@apache.org
Subject: Re: Tree tagged.
Message-ID: <20010205062955.C26044@lyra.org>
Mail-Followup-To: new-httpd@apache.org
References: <200102050935.UAA13668@silk.apana.org.au>
 <Pine.LNX.4.21.0102050629270.5014-100000@koj>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0102050629270.5014-100000@koj>;
 from rbb@covalent.net on Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 06:30:25AM -0800

Woo! That's the spirit!

;-)

On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 06:30:25AM -0800, rbb@covalent.net wrote:
> 
> > >This tarball should be tested by everybody who is interested in Apache
> > >2.0.  If everybody agrees, then this tag can be used as a basis to release
> > >the first beta version of Apache 2.0 either Tuesday or Wednesday this
> > >week.
> > 
> > Err, this came about a bit quick. Your scoreboard changes broke the OS/2
> > MPM big time & I'm still picking up the pieces. I've got it back to a state
> > where it compiles & serves pages but mod_status's output is still mostly
> > wrong & I was going to try to get it right before commiting the lot.
> 
> This was just a tag, so that we could start to tag every week.  If this
> doesn't work on OS/2, then we wait until next week, and tag again, not a
> problem at all.  I may tag in the middle of this week, so that we can get
> the procedure right.
> 
> Ryan
> 
> _______________________________________________________________________________
> Ryan Bloom                        	rbb@apache.org
> 406 29th St.
> San Francisco, CA 94131
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-- 
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/