Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 38208 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2001 23:32:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org Received: (qmail 38184 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2001 23:32:26 -0000 From: Jim Jagielski Message-Id: <200102012332.SAA12519@devsys.jaguNET.com> Subject: Re: cvs commit: apache-1.3 STATUS To: new-httpd@apache.org Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 18:32:30 -0500 (EST) Reply-To: jim@jaguNET.com In-Reply-To: <004c01c08ca6$71158770$92c0b0d0@roweclan.net> from "William A. Rowe, Jr." at Feb 01, 2001 05:26:44 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > > > jim 01/02/01 15:05:29 > > > > Modified: . STATUS > > Log: > > Taking a stand - Freeze 1.3 tree and release > > next week > > Mr's Stoddard and Rowe are looking at a potentially very clean > optimization to Windows, and debating the merrits of a particular > option, in sideband. We would be happy to include you all, but > it is nauseatingly Win32 specific. I would be hopelessly lost :) > > With the exception of that one, very minor issue, I concur 100%. > We may not choose to do it, and if we do, we will both thoroughly > test it, but expect there are no other appropriate changes for > the next release cycle. Except if you reached the original > mod_userdir author with our question. > > Bill > -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] jim@jaguNET.com [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "Casanova will have many weapons; To beat him you will have to have more than forks and flatulence."