Return-Path: 
 <new-httpd-return-13032-apmail-new-httpd-archive=apache.org@apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org
Received: (qmail 92885 invoked by uid 500); 7 Feb 2001 14:51:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org
list-help: <mailto:new-httpd-help@apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:new-httpd-unsubscribe@apache.org>
list-post: <mailto:new-httpd@apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org
Received: (qmail 92873 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2001 14:51:02 -0000
Message-ID: <060b01c09116$912c6e10$e4421b09@raleigh.ibm.com>
From: "Bill Stoddard" <bill@wstoddard.com>
To: <new-httpd@apache.org>
References: <20010206190306.E4793@hbesoftware.com>
 <Pine.BSF.4.21.0102061608060.75094-100000@escher.vanzoest.com>
 <20010206182524.Q26044@lyra.org> <001701c090b3$bbf909e0$6401a8c0@apache>
 <20010207010255.V26044@lyra.org>
Subject: Re: [mod_proxy] Help offered
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 09:59:27 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N

> > > Feh. If that's so, then there is even more reason to move the proxy out
of
> > > the core and into a separate CVS repository for independent development.
> >
> > I disagree. Squid is a heavy weight 'solution' for folks just interested
in proxy pass (aka
> > "reverse" proxy).
>
> And Apache is light weight? :-)
>

<snip>

>
> While it would be nice for us to have it (due to licensing, features,
> whatever), I don't see it as critical or core to our main goal of being a
> web server.

I would be happy if we just had a good efficient proxy pass module in core
Apache. The rest can go into a seperate repository.


Bill