httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>
Subject Re: 2.0 broken semantics?
Date Mon, 26 Feb 2001 05:24:22 GMT
From: "Bruce" <bruce@toorak.com>
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2001 11:18 PM


> put in Allow from 127.0.0.1

Sorry if I wasn't clear enough - yes 127.0.0.1 does work, localhost does not.
Seeing as localhost should parse through dns lookup, this would be a bug.

> >Works.  Actually, I think it boils down to:
> >
> >Allow from localhost
> >
> >being broken on win32.  s/localhost/127.0.0.1/ resolves the problem.
> >Since it's seeing the request from 127.0.0.1 it never parses out the
> >.rowe-clan.net allowance.
> >
> >More experimenting to do.  BTW... the ServerName 127.0.0.1 is for s&!+,
> >it's not even commented out.  I will eliminate it without objection tommorow
> >morning.
> >
> >Bill
> >
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Bruce" <bruce@toorak.com>
> >To: <new-httpd@apache.org>
> >Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2001 10:59 PM
> >Subject: Re: 2.0 broken semantics?
> >
> >
> >> What happens when you place Allow from All at the bottom.
> >>
> >> >This code fails:
> >> >
> >> ><Location /server-status>
> >> >    SetHandler server-status
> >> >    Order deny,allow
> >> >    Deny from all
> >> >    Allow from localhost
> >> >    Allow from .rowe-clan.net
> >> ></Location>
> >> >
> >> >The result is always denied.  Any ideas?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> 
> 
> 
> 


Mime
View raw message