httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>
Subject Re: Apache 2.0.12 ready for testing
Date Sun, 25 Feb 2001 02:06:01 GMT
Only one fault with your tarball...

You seem to have grabbed the 1.3 FAQ --- I think you may want to update the 
'rolling the tarball' docs with the following: 

  wget http://www.apache.org/docs-2.0/misc/FAQ.html

Not that I suppose it matters, just thought we should catch this now.  Our 2.0
copy seems to have all sorts of goofiness, like missing ';' after an &lt tag,
etc.  So I used your checkout for the 'zip' ball.  By the _13 release, I hope
we have a good file for docs-2.0 ready to go, and worth revisiting.

ITMT... Win32 is dead.

Linking...
   Creating library Debug/libhttpd.lib and object Debug/libhttpd.exp
util_xml.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol __imp__apr_xml_parser_geterror@12
util_xml.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol __imp__apr_xml_parser_done@8
util_xml.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol __imp__apr_xml_parser_feed@12
util_xml.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol __imp__apr_xml_parser_create@4
Debug/libhttpd.dll : fatal error LNK1120: 4 unresolved externals

I'm reviewing to correct this tangle, and would be happy to see us roll again today.

Bill

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <rbb@covalent.net>
To: <new-httpd@apache.org>
Sent: Saturday, February 24, 2001 9:12 AM
Subject: Apache 2.0.12 ready for testing


> 
> I have tagged and rolled 2.0.12, and they are currently in
> dev.apache.org/dist.
> 
> Please test and report results.  If there are no -1's, then I will release
> these as an alpha version on Monday.  Last time we did this, the tarballs
> were never actually released, this time we have a hard, set date of
> Monday.  PLEASE TEST!  Quick warning.  There is a VERY real possibility
> that there are some extra files in the top level directory.  I will be
> checking that later today.  If they are there, I will remove them, fix the
> script and re-roll.  If they are there, it is not a problem with the code,
> it is a problem with the script we use to roll the tarball.
> 
> Ryan
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________________________________________
> Ryan Bloom                        rbb@apache.org
> 406 29th St.
> San Francisco, CA 94131
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 


Mime
View raw message