Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 5246 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jan 2001 20:58:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org Received: (qmail 5067 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2001 20:58:54 -0000 Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 13:02:38 -0800 (PST) From: rbb@covalent.net X-Sender: rbb@koj To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: Re: ap_r* performance patch In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Mon, 22 Jan 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote: > On Mon, 22 Jan 2001 rbb@covalent.net wrote: > > > Oh BTW, mod_perl and mod_snake have already written the buffering logic > > for themselves. My patch allows them to remove that logic, AFAICT, Greg's > > does not. > > the tests i ran yesterday (with greg.patch and rbb.patch) both used > ap_rwrite() instead of the modperl buffer thingy. Yeah, but you were strictly testing a handler. Try doing that with a filter and Greg's patch. The filter is registered as an FTYPE_CONTENT + 1, so it MUST be at the very top of the filter stack, it is not possible to insert it after a mod_perl filter. Ryan _______________________________________________________________________________ Ryan Bloom rbb@apache.org 406 29th St. San Francisco, CA 94131 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------