Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 51842 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2001 21:44:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org Received: (qmail 51809 invoked from network); 18 Jan 2001 21:44:01 -0000 Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 13:47:29 -0800 (PST) From: rbb@covalent.net X-Sender: rbb@koj To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: Re: module declaration inconsistencies In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N Where is the problem here? The change in 2.0 was done to make things easier and correct for Windows. Ryan On Thu, 18 Jan 2001, Tony Finch wrote: > > We aren't declaring module structures consistently in 1.3 or in 2.0 > (see PR#7095 for one example of many). > > AIUI the correct way in 1.3 is > module MODULE_VAR_EXPORT foo_module; > and in 2.0 it is > module AP_DECLARE_DATA foo_module; > with no caveats. > > I'll fix later unless someone pops up with a problem. > > Tony. > -- > f.a.n.finch fanf@covalent.net dot@dotat.at > "Then they attacked a town. A small town, I'll admit. > But nevertheless a town of people. People who died." > > _______________________________________________________________________________ Ryan Bloom rbb@apache.org 406 29th St. San Francisco, CA 94131 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------